Call or text: Coming Soon

Strict Liability Dog Bite Cases: San Francisco

In many states, strict liability laws apply to dog bite cases, meaning that dog owners can be held liable for injuries caused by their pets regardless of negligence or prior knowledge of the dog’s aggressive tendencies. If you’ve been bitten by a dog in a state with strict liability laws, you don’t have to prove that the owner was negligent – the fact that you were bitten may be enough to hold the owner accountable.

We specialize in helping dog bite victims navigate strict liability laws and pursue the compensation they deserve.

What Is Strict Liability in Dog Bite Cases?

Understanding How Strict Liability Laws Work

Strict liability, where it applies, means that the dog owner can be held responsible for injuries caused by their dog without needing to prove negligence or prior knowledge of dangerous tendencies.

California follows a strict liability rule for dog bites, meaning dog owners are held liable for bite-related injuries regardless of the dog’s previous behavior or the owner’s knowledge of its tendencies. This law applies to most situations where the victim was lawfully on public or private property, including ordinary citizens, not just individuals performing official duties like mail carriers or emergency responders. The victim does not need to prove the owner was negligent or that the dog had a history of aggression

How Strict Liability Differs from Negligence Claims

Strict Liability vs. Negligence: Key Differences

In dog bite cases, the legal approach differs depending on whether the case involves strict liability or negligence. Here’s how the two differ:

  • Negligence Claims: In a negligence-based case, the victim must prove that the dog owner failed to take reasonable steps to prevent the attack. This might include ignoring leash laws, failing to restrain a known aggressive dog, or not warning visitors about the dog’s behavior.
  • Strict Liability Claims: In strict liability cases, the dog owner is automatically held responsible for any injuries caused by their dog, even if they followed all local laws and had no knowledge of the dog’s potential for aggression.

Strict liability benefits victims by eliminating the need to prove negligence, as the dog owner is automatically responsible for the injuries caused. This makes it easier for victims to recover compensation in dog bite cases.

When Does Strict Liability Apply?

Situations Where Strict Liability Dog Bite Laws Are Enforced

In California, strict liability generally applies when the victim is lawfully on the property and performing a legal duty (such as mail carriers), or in limited circumstances where the dog’s behavior should have alerted the owner to potential aggression. For most other victims, negligence must be proven unless local laws provide stricter rules.

  • The Attack Occurred in a Public Space: If the dog bite occurred in a public area, such as a park or sidewalk, the dog owner is likely to be held strictly liable for the attack.
  • The Victim Was Not Provoking the Dog: In most strict liability cases, the victim must not have provoked the dog in any way, such as teasing or attacking the animal.
  • No Prior Aggression Is Required: Unlike negligence claims, which may require proving the dog had a history of aggression, strict liability holds the dog owner accountable even if the dog has never bitten anyone before.

Our team will assess the specific laws in your state and ensure that your claim is filed under the correct legal framework to maximize your chances of recovery.

How We Can Help You Pursue a Strict Liability Claim

We’ll Fight to Hold the Dog Owner Liable for Your Injuries

We have extensive experience handling strict liability dog bite cases. Our legal team will guide you through the process of filing a claim, ensuring you receive the compensation you need for your recovery. Here’s how we help:

  • Evaluate Your Case Under Strict Liability Laws: We will determine whether your state’s strict liability laws apply to your case and explain your legal rights and options.
  • Collect Evidence of the Attack: While strict liability doesn’t require proof of negligence, we will gather evidence such as medical records, photos, and witness statements to strengthen your claim.
  • Handle Insurance Negotiations: Our team will negotiate with the dog owner’s insurance company to secure a fair settlement for your medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
  • Prepare for Court if Necessary: If the insurance company refuses to offer a fair settlement, we are prepared to take your case to court to ensure you get the compensation you deserve.

You don’t have to navigate strict liability laws alone. Our team is here to make the process as smooth as possible and ensure that you are fully compensated for your injuries.

Common Defenses in Strict Liability Cases

Potential Challenges and How We Overcome Them

While strict liability laws make it easier to hold a dog owner accountable, there are still some defenses that the owner or their insurance company may try to use, including:

  • Provocation Defense: The dog owner may argue that the victim provoked the dog, which is a valid defense under California’s modified liability laws. Provocation can reduce or eliminate the dog owner’s liability, so proving that the attack was unprovoked is crucial.
  • Trespassing Defense: If the victim was unlawfully on the dog owner’s property, California’s strict liability rule may not apply. We’ll demonstrate that the victim was lawfully on the property at the time of the attack.
  • Assumption of Risk: In some cases, the owner may claim that the victim knowingly approached the dog and assumed the risk of injury. We’ll challenge these defenses by demonstrating that the victim did not willingly put themselves in harm’s way.

Our team is prepared to handle these defenses and ensure that the strict liability rules are properly applied to hold the dog owner responsible for the attack.

Frequently Asked Questions

FAQs About Strict Liability Dog Bite Cases

Do all states have strict liability laws for dog bites?
No, not all states have strict liability laws. Some states follow a “one-bite rule” or require the victim to prove that the owner was negligent. Our legal team will help you determine whether strict liability laws apply in your state.

Can I still file a claim if the dog has never bitten anyone before?
Yes, under strict liability laws, the dog owner can be held responsible for a first-time attack. You don’t have to prove that the dog had a history of aggression.

How much compensation can I receive in a strict liability case?
The amount of compensation depends on the severity of your injuries, medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Our team will help you assess the full value of your claim.